Articles Posted in Injury Cases

Surprisingly, falls have now overtaken car accidents as the number one cause of spinal cord injuries.  And, the average age for a spinal cord injury victim has risen by a decade to age 51.  Most researchers believe there is a combination of factors at play in these new findings: (1) older Americans are more active than ever; (2) better safety protection in the form of seat belts and airbags; and (3) the increased age of the general population.  

While the most common cause and the average age for a spinal cord injury have changed, one thing remains constant: spinal cord injuries exact a devastating toll on the victim and the entire familiy.  And the burdens are not just the obvious physical limitations but also financial and emotional costs.  From 2007 to 2009, just a two year period, the cost of emergency room charges for spinal cord injuries in the U.S. totaled $1.6 billion.   And emergency room costs for victims and their families is just the beginning. Spinal cord injury victims require a lifetime of care and the cost of that care can range from $1million to $5 million, according to The National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. 

Emotionally, the change in lifestyle and limitations can understandably lead to depression and anger for the victim and family members.  Economic difficulties associated with the tremendous medical care and the loss of a wage earner for the family can cause anxiety and fear.  

The Diocese of San Bernardino has announced a $3.8 million settlement in two lawsuits which alleged a former Catholic priest sexually abused two children.  The priest at the center of the scandal is now 60 years old and defrocked.  He pled guilty to lewd and lascivious acts with a 12 year old boy.  He served a mere eight months in jail for his crimes.  

This was a criminal act by a sick man.  The fact that he was a priest is not a mitigating factor but instead an aggravating one as church should be the safest place a child can be outside the care of his or her own family.  At The Law Offices of John Day, P.C., we are passionate about the rights of victims of sexual abuse.  We have successfully made new law in the Tennessee Supreme Court in a sexual abuse case against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Nashville, and  John Day has been asked to speak at a seminar hosted by The National Center for Crime Victims to help educate crime victim advocates about protecting victims’ rights through the civil court system. 

If you would like to confidentially discuss a sexual abuse case, simply fill out this form to schedule an appointment or call us anytime at 615-742-4880 or toll-free at 866-812-8787 for a free, no-obligation consultation with one of our award-winning lawyers.  You can meet with either a male or female lawyer, whichever makes you feel most comfortable to discuss your case.  

Today, Tennessee saw a historic change in its liquor laws. The House passed a bill to allow grocery stores to sell wine.   The Senate had previously passed its version of the bill last month and proponents anticipate the Senate will approve the minor changes made by the House. As for the final step, Governor Haslam is expected to sign the bill as he has previously indicated he would defer to the Legislature on this issue.

Whether you are for or against the passage of the law, one thing is for sure: the privilege of being able to sell wine also carries some responsibility. Let’s review the basics of Tennessee liquor liability law, which were passed by the Tennessee Legislature. The statutes make it quite clear that the consumption of alcohol, rather than the furnishing of it, is the proximate cause of any injury. What does this mean? It means if you go to the grocery store, buy and then drink a bottle of wine and somehow injure yourself due to your intoxication, then you have no claim against the grocery store who sold you the wine. And the law goes one step further: if you go to the grocery store, buy and drink a bottle of wine and then cause a car accident in which you hurt someone else, the grocery store is still not liable. 

But, there are exceptions to these general rules: you may have a claim against a grocery store if the grocery store sold wine to a minor or if the grocery store sold wine to an “obviously intoxicated” person.   Proof of one of these exceptions must be established beyond a reasonable doubt, which is a much higher burden than the ordinary civil case. In most civil cases, the injured party must only prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence. 

We have already written a couple of posts about Positive Train Control, which the CEO of Metrolink described as “perhaps the most important safety innovation in our lifetime”.  (The first article explained how Positive Train Control can prevent several types of deadly train accidents and the delays in implementing itThe second article discussed whether Positive Train Control could have prevented the recent New York commuter train derailment which killed 4 people and injured dozens more.)  If you did not read those articles, here is the deal in a nutshell: Following a 2008 Metrolink train crash in California, legislation was passed to require Positive Train Control and the implementation deadline was 2015.  But with that date looming, most railroad companies are claiming they can’t meet the deadline. 

Now, here is the latest.  Following that same 2008 train crash, the National Transportation Safety Board began pushing the Railroad Administration to install cameras in train cabs to record drivers.  The thought being this would deter dangerous behavior like texting while operating the train, sleeping, etc.  Additional cameras would face outward to record the tracks for hazards.  And, in the event of a crash, both sets of cameras would help investigators determine the cause of the accident.  But to date, the Railroad Administration has not even proposed a rule (the first step in the process) to make the installation of these cameras mandatory. 

Following the New York commuter train accident in December, two United States senators have publicly called out the Railroad Administration for its delay in implementing the rule.  And now, finally, the Railroad Administration says they will move on the rule sometime later this year. 

Last Sunday morning a New York commuter train bound for Manhattan’s Grand Central Station derailed on a sharp curve killing 4 innocent people, critically injuring 11 people and injuring another 46 passengers. While the NTSB is still investigating the accident, early information indicates the train was traveling 82 mph on a curve with a maximum speed limit of 30 mph.

While this investigation continues, it appears this tragedy could have been prevented by Positive Train Control. Positive Train Control can slow or stop a train before certain accidents occur. One type of accident that Positive Train Control is designed to prevent is speed-related derailments. Other types of accidents that can be prevented by Positive Train Control are switching errors, collisions, and track route errors.

We first told you about Positive Train Control in this post and on the Law Offices of John Day, P.C. website.   Federal law requires railroad companies to implement Positive Train Control by 2015, but a push is on to extend that date to 2018 or later. To stop these preventable types of accidents, we hope Congress will refuse to grant an extension for this important safety technology that can save lives.

The good news: technology exists which will prevent a large number of serious train crashes. The bad news: implementation of this technology will likely be delayed causing commuter train passengers and others to remain at risk. Below is the background of this important issue.

In September of 2008, a Metrolink commuter train filled with passengers collided with a freight train killing 25 innocent people and injuring more than 100 others. In response to this tragedy, Congress passed the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 which mandated implementation of Positive Train Control for all commuter rail lines and for freight lines hauling hazardous materials. 

So what is Positive Train Control? It is technology which can stop or slow a train before certain types of accidents occur. For example, derailments caused by excessive speed, train-to-train collisions, unauthorized incursions and switching errors can all be prevented by Positive Train Control. Without question, Positive Train Control would have prevented the 2008 Metrolink accident. 

If you have been seriously injured in an accident with a state or local government employee, your case is subject to a number of special rules and procedures. Below is an explanation of two of the special rules and a practical hurdle our office sees time and time again. 

The first special rule is that a local  government does not have any liability if the employee who injured you was performing a discretionary function. What is the discretionary function? The discretionary function exception to liability is meant to protect the government from tort liability in situations in which special social, scientific, economic, professional or political policy issues are involved.   In short, policy and planning decisions are typically protected, but operational acts in which an employee is simply following a policy or regulation are not immune from liability.   (The discretionary function rules are not applicable to claims against the State of Tennessee, only local governmental entities.)

The next special rule involves damage caps. The State of Tennessee’s damages have been capped by statute at $1,000,000 per accident and $300,000 per person.  Local government liability is capped by statute at $300,000 per person and $700,000 per accident.  These damage caps have been not increased in over a decade  and are woefully short of compensating an injury victim with serious or catastrophic damages. (Note:  there is no cap on damages in cases against the federal government.  However, there are other special rules applicable to that type of case as well. Search this site for information about claims against the federal government.)

Halloween is a wonderful holiday for kids: costumes, trick-or-treating with friends, candy. But, it can also be a very dangerous holiday. A child is twice as likely to be hit and killed by a car on Halloween. Here are some steps to help avoid a tragic accident that will affect the lives of everyone involved forever:

Motorists:

1. Slow down and be vigilant in residential areas especially between the hours of 5:30 to 9:30.

In Nashville and other cities across Tennessee, pedestrian traffic has increased as more and more people have chosen to live in an urban environment that allows for easy walks to work, restaurants, bars, museums, and retail centers. Tennessee is also blessed with many beautiful roadways which walkers, joggers and runners use for exercise. 

Now that the lovely fall weather is here and more people are getting out and about, let’s familiarize ourself with our basic rights and responsibilities as motorists and pedestrians:

1. Pedestrians have the right of way at all intersections and driveways.

With summer’s sweltering temperatures coming to an end, more Tennessee bicyclists and runners will take to the streets. So, it is a good time for all of us to remember our respective rights and responsibilities on the roadway. In Part One, we will start with bicyclists and Part Two will cover pedestrians.

Under Tennessee law, every person riding a bicycle is granted the same rights as operators of motor vehicles. Of course, bicyclists also owe certain duties. For instance, bicycle operators and passengers under age 16 must wear a helmet.  All bicyclists  must obey traffic signs and signals and the bike must be equipped with a head lamp and rear reflectors if riding at night. In addition, if a bicyclist is traveling at less than the normal speed of traffic, the bicyclists should ride as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of roadway.

Conversely, motorists must respect the bicyclists right to be on the roadway and treat the bicyclist in the same manner it would another motor vehicle. This means using proper signals, passing only where it is permitted and when it can be done safely, not tailgating or following too closely, etc. 

Contact Information