Articles Posted in Medical Malpractice (Health Care Liability)

There is a one-year deadline (called a "statute of limitation") for bringing a Tennessee medical malpractice case.  

Changes to the law several years ago means that a person must give formal notice to each defendant in a medical malpractice case before a lawsuit can be filed in the court system.  That notice must be sent no more than one year from the date of the negligent act or negligent omission causing an injury.

The statute that mandates pre-suit notice has some very specific requirements about what the notice must say and how it must be sent to the potential defendant or defendants.  Tennessee appellate courts have not yet had the occasion to do an in-depth examination of how strictly these requirements must be met to satisfy the requirement of pre-suit notice, and thus it should be assumed that each of the statutory requirements must be followed to the letter until we have more guidance from Tennessee appellate courts.  It would be a mistake for any consumer to attempt to give notice of a potential  medical malpractice case without the assistance of an experienced Tennessee medical malpractice lawyer.

There are a unique set of rules applicable to Tennessee medical malpractice cases.  (Note: the Tennessee Legislature has decreed that such cases must now be called "health care liability actions.)

In a health care liability action in Tennessee, both the liability of the health care provider and the link between the negligent action or omission ("causation") must be proved by one or more expert witnesses in the vast, vast majority of cases.   The liability expert must 1) practice in a field of medicine that makes his or her testimony pertinent to the case; 2) practice in that field of medicine in Tennessee or a contiguous state in the year preceding the incident; and 3) be familiar with the regularly accepted level of medical practice in the community where the incident took place or a similar community. 

The causation expert must also meet the geographic requirements mentioned above.  However, this expert does not need to know the standard of care in the community where the incident occurred if his or his expert opinion is limited to causation issues.

As news about the fungal meningitis outbreak continues to dribble out, some might assume that we know what we need to know to evaluate commence and evaluate lawsuits against those responsible for causing the break.

We do not.

The fact of the matter is there is still much to be known about the fungal meningitis nightmare before these cases can be fully evaluated.  Why?  Because facts essential to understanding the liability issues in this case are in possession of people and corporations who have not yet been forced to share that information.  Sure, various governmental agencies have got some information from these folks, and some of that information has found its way to the press, but there is lots of information yet to be fully brought to the public eye or confirmed. 

A Tennessee medical malpractice claim, now called a "health care liability action," should only be filed by a lawyer experienced in health care liability litigation.  I would never recommend that a non-lawyer file such a case.

There are many, many reasons for this, not the least of which are that way that one files a lawsuit against a health care provider.  Health care providers have persuaded the Tennessee General Assembly to erect artificial barriers to lawsuits against them.  A couple of those barriers have to do with how the lawsuit is initiated.  First, almost always pre-lawsuit notice must be given to the health car provider in a very specific way.  Second, when the lawsuit is filed a "certificate of good faith" must be filed.  Once again, Tennessee law has very specific requirements for a certificate of good faith.

The failure to strictly comply with Tennessee law on  these matters will result in dismissal of the case.  Dismissal of the case will  result in the imposition of financial sanctions against  person who did not comply with the law by initiating the case.

The maker of the steroid solution that was used at Saint Thomas Outpatient Neurosurgery Center  has voluntarily recalled the product.  However, theTennessean reports that there has been no definitive link between the steroid solution and the fungal meningitis infections that have injured nine people and killed two.  The company that manufactured the solution has not been identified.

All of the infected patients received lumbar epidural steroid injections at the Saint Thomas Outpatient Neurosurgery Center between July 30, 2012 and September 20, 2012.  All 737 patients who received the injections during this period have been contacted by the facility.  The Center has now been voluntarily closed.

Meningitis is a infection of the membrane that surrounds the brain and spinal court.  Media reports indicate that Aspergillus, a mold commonly found outdoors, is the infectious organism impacting the Saint Thomas patients.  This type of meningitis is not spread by person-to-person contact.

Two patients from the Specialty Surgery Center in Crossville, Tennessee have contracted fungal meningitis, according to a recent report of the Tennessee Department of Health as reported by Channel 2 News.

The facility has stopped performing lumbar steroid injections but has not been closed. 

Earlier news reports indicated that the outbreak was limited to three facilities in Tennessee, with the Saint Thomas Outpatient Neurosurgery Center identified as first facility.  Two patients from Saint Thomas have died because of the infection.  The third facility has not been identified.

Local news outlets are reporting that some eleven patients who had lumbar epidural steroid injections at Nashville’s Saint Hospital have contracted meningitis.

Meningitis is an inflammation of the meninges, which is the membrane surrounding your brain and spinal cord.  Usually meningitis is caused by a viral infection, but it can also be caused by bacterial or fungal infections.  Meningitis can be deadly, and news reports indicate that two people have died from meningitis contracted at the Saint Thomas Outpatient Neurosurgery Center.

The Center was voluntarily closed on September 20, 2012. A total of 737 patients who had lumbar epidural steroid injections between July 30, 2012 and September 20, 2012 have been notified .

 

An updated article in The Tennessean reveals that the meningitis outbreak at the Saint Thomas Outpatient Neurosurgery Clinic was caused by a fungus.

Some eleven patients have contracted a strain of fungal meningitis – all of them received epidural steroid injections at the Outpatient Neurosurgery Clinic between July 30 and September 20, 2012.

There is some evidence that pain-relieving injections themselves may be to blame in this case. The Tennessee Department of Health has indicated that the injections have been recalled and that patients in more than a dozen other states could be affected. One patient in another state allegedly contracted meningitis after receiving a epidural steroid injection.

A person who suffers an injury giving rise to a Tennessee medical malpractice (now known as a health care liability)  case  has a right to recover damages for their injuries.  As a Tennessee medical malpractice attorney i am fortunate to have represented many people who have been injured as a result of an error by a health care provider.

Tennessee law provides that a medical malpractice victim can recover damages for the following:

  • medical expenses
  • lost wages
  • pain 
  • suffering 
  • disfigurement 
  • disability
  • loss of enjoyment of life.

If the injury  results in future or permanent physical or emotional problems, additional damages may be recovered for 

As Tennessee medical malpractice lawyers, we are often asked to evaluate claims against doctors who practice in the specialty of internal medicine.   (For an understanding of what is necessary to prove a medical malpractice claim in Tennessee, read our Legal Guide titled "Understanding Medical Malpractice Cases in Tennessee." 

The Doctor’s Company, a insurance company that insures doctors for medical malpractice claims, has published a study that looks at past medical malpractice claims against internists.  Here are some of the results of the study:

  • 58 percent of the allegations in these claims were related to diagnosis
  • 23 percent were related to medical treatment
  • 9.5 percent were related to improper medication management,
  • 2.2 percent involved ordering errors
  • 1.6 percent involved patient monitoring
  • 5.7 percent were miscellaneous.

The diagnosis related claims were further broken down into two separate categories – failure to diagnose (79%)  and delay in diagnosis (21%).  The largest number of failure to diagnose claims were cardiovascular disorders, while the great number of claims in the delay in diagnosis category had to do with delay in diagnosing tumors.

Contact Information